CRAN Package Check Results for Package noncompliance

Last updated on 2020-06-01 14:49:57 CEST.

Flavor Version Tinstall Tcheck Ttotal Status Flags
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-clang 0.2.2 22.04 53.27 75.31 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc 0.2.2 15.97 40.48 56.45 OK
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang 0.2.2 100.51 NOTE
r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc 0.2.2 89.17 NOTE
r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 61.00 110.00 171.00 OK
r-patched-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 17.66 50.43 68.09 OK
r-patched-solaris-x86 0.2.2 114.90 OK
r-release-linux-x86_64 0.2.2 18.41 50.41 68.82 OK
r-release-osx-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-release-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 45.00 170.00 215.00 OK
r-oldrel-osx-x86_64 0.2.2 OK
r-oldrel-windows-ix86+x86_64 0.2.2 57.00 100.00 157.00 OK

Check Details

Version: 0.2.2
Check: compiled code
Result: NOTE
    File ‘noncompliance/libs/noncompliance.so’:
     Found no calls to: ‘R_registerRoutines’, ‘R_useDynamicSymbols’
    
    It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
    search.
    
    See ‘Writing portable packages’ in the ‘Writing R Extensions’ manual.
Flavors: r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-clang, r-devel-linux-x86_64-fedora-gcc